Joidibeats wrote:And I Disagree with you,
, everybody knows you defend 5k to blood and sweat, so no-ones gonna take that seriously anymore.
You seem to bash your fantom G in so many ways I think its unfair. Only negative thing you said about 5k had something to do with its capabilities to chop right?
I think its kinda ridicilous that you have to post your defences to every post here, mvnation and propably futureproducers too, considering the subject 5k.
The reason you defend this machine, I dont know, But If thats some kind of propaganda after you bought it and felt bad cause it sucked and now you try to turn the tables for some reason. I think its just stupid.
Hell, you are the reason Just Blaze dont visit the forums anymore. nuff said
It is ok to disagree with me....although most of what you have written has nothing to do with this topic..but I will entertain you for a moment.
Over the years, I have seriously defended the MPC 2000, 2000XL, 2500, 3000, and the 4000 although these machines speak for themselves. So what I am doing today for the MPC 5000 is no different. There are numerous threads where I wrote about what I like and dislike about the MPC 5K. Do a search and you will find my input. The chopping and sampling functions are there areas I would like to see improved because they are what I use most.
Fantom G? I still own a Fantom G and its OS has flaws when it comes to the chopping, sampling and sequencing functions (dude...can you see the pattern here) when you look at what the Fantom X and MV-8800 does. This is the truth that you can visit the Fantom Forum to read that many agree. I don't hold anything back. I am one of the few people that actually spends time talking about workstations that I actually own/owned or use.
Just Blaze? I am the reason why he doesn't visit the forum? Wow...I thought he doesn't visit the forum because he is being paid by Roland to tell people how great their products are (although he still uses an MPC). But if I am the reason why he doesn't come around here..it is probably because I exposed his lies about the MPC 4000 being as stable as the MPC 5000. He didn't even own the MPC 4000 when it was first released (but I did). The first 3 operating systems of the MPC 4000 were terrible. He later retracted his statement and talked about later MPC 4K operating systems.
To wrap this up.....I am a member of the forums you listed. And as a forum member, I am entitled to give my opinion..and give it I shall. I am not bothered by what you write. You shouldn't feel bothered by what I write since it is aimed directly at these machines and not you personally. If you do feel bothered, that is your problem. Nuff said.
